Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/131/17

    Case C-137/04: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten) — Amy Rockler v Försäkringskassan, formerly Riksförsäkringsverket (Freedom of movement for workers — Officials and servants of the European Communities — Parental benefits — Taking into account of the period of affiliation to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities)

    OJ C 131, 3.6.2006, p. 10–10 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.6.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 131/10


    Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten) — Amy Rockler v Försäkringskassan, formerly Riksförsäkringsverket

    (Case C-137/04) (1)

    (Freedom of movement for workers - Officials and servants of the European Communities - Parental benefits - Taking into account of the period of affiliation to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities)

    (2006/C 131/17)

    Language of the case: Swedish

    Referring court

    Regeringsrätten

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Amy Rockler

    Defendant: Försäkringskassan, formerly Riksförsäkringsverket

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regeringsrätten — Interpretation of Article 39 EC — Right to parental benefit (‘föräldrapenning’) — No account taken of period of cover by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme provided for by the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings applies, the period during which a worker was affiliated to the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities must be taken into account.


    (1)  OJ C 106, 30.04.2004.


    Top