EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/131/05
Case C-232/03: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Workers — Freedom of movement — Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad)
Case C-232/03: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Workers — Freedom of movement — Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad)
Case C-232/03: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Workers — Freedom of movement — Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad)
OJ C 131, 3.6.2006, p. 3–4
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.6.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 131/3 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland
(Case C-232/03) (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Workers - Freedom of movement - Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad)
(2006/C 131/05)
Language of the Case: Finnish
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and I. Koskinen, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski and T. Pynnä, acting as Agents)
Intervener: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: K. Manji, acting as Agent and P. Whipple, barrister)
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Arts. 10 and 39 EC — Conditions for the use for vehicles registered abroad and made available by their employer to workers residing in Finland and employed abroad
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares that, by preventing cross-frontier workers residing in Finland and employed in another Member State from benefiting from the use of company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered in the latter State on the sole ground that the cross-frontier workers concerned reside on Finnish territory, into which the vehicles belonging to their employers have been imported, and by preventing the cross-frontier workers concerned from benefiting, for professional and private purposes, from the use of company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered in the latter State, while those vehicles are neither intended to be used mainly in Finland on a permanent basis nor, in fact, used in that way, on the sole ground that those workers reside on Finnish territory, into which the vehicles belonging to their employers have been imported, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
|
3. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs; |
|
4. |
Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |