This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/096/22
Case T-342/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Adam v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Definition of services carried out for another State )
Case T-342/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Adam v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Definition of services carried out for another State )
Case T-342/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Adam v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Definition of services carried out for another State )
OJ C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 12–12
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.4.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 96/12 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February 2006 — Adam v Commission
(Case T-342/04) (1)
(Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Definition of 'services carried out for another State')
(2006/C 96/22)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Herta Adam (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)
Application for
Annulment of the Commission's decision of 2 September 2003 refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |