Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/074/29

    Case T-92/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2006 — Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall and Others v Commission (State aid — tax exemption scheme applied to the reserves established by nuclear installations established in Germany for the purpose of eliminating their radioactive waste and the definitive — Decision finding that there is no Sate aid at the end of the preliminary examination procedure — Action for annulment)

    OJ C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 15–15 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.3.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 74/15


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2006 — Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall and Others v Commission

    (Case T-92/02) (1)

    (State aid - tax exemption scheme applied to the reserves established by nuclear installations established in Germany for the purpose of eliminating their radioactive waste and the definitive - Decision finding that there is no Sate aid at the end of the preliminary examination procedure - Action for annulment)

    (2006/C 74/29)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicants: Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall GmbH (Schwäbisch Hall, Germany), Stadtwerke Tübingen GmbH (Tübingen, Germany) and Stadtwerke Uelzen GmbH (Uelzen, Germany) (represented by: D. Fouquet, lawyer)

    Defendants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreuschitz, Agent)

    Interveners in support of the defendant: E.ON Kernkraft GmbH (Hanover, Germany), RWE Power AG (Essen, Germany), EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Hamburgische Electricitäts-Werke AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein and D. Sellner, lawyers)

    Application for

    Annulment of Commission Decision C (2001) 3967 final of 11 December 2001

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders the applicants, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the Commission and by the interveners.


    (1)  OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002.


    Top