EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/048/55
Case T-169/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — Arysta Lifescience v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE — Former national word mark CARPO — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-169/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — Arysta Lifescience v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE — Former national word mark CARPO — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-169/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — Arysta Lifescience v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE — Former national word mark CARPO — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
OJ C 48, 25.2.2006, p. 29–29
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.2.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 48/29 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 December 2005 — Arysta Lifescience v OHIM
(Case T-169/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE - Former national word mark CARPO - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2006/C 48/55)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Arysta Lifescience SAS, formally Calliope SAS (Noguères, France) (represented by: S. Legrand, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BASF AG (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany)
Action
brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2004 (Case R 289/2003-1) relating to the opposition proceedings between Calliope SAS and BASF AG
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |