This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/330/55
Case T-258/99: Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2005 — Makro Cash & Carry Nederland v Commission (State aid — Commission notice on the de minimis rule for State aid — Service stations — Risk of cumulation of aid — Aid covered by the notice — Legal interest in bringing proceedings)
Case T-258/99: Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2005 — Makro Cash & Carry Nederland v Commission (State aid — Commission notice on the de minimis rule for State aid — Service stations — Risk of cumulation of aid — Aid covered by the notice — Legal interest in bringing proceedings)
Case T-258/99: Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2005 — Makro Cash & Carry Nederland v Commission (State aid — Commission notice on the de minimis rule for State aid — Service stations — Risk of cumulation of aid — Aid covered by the notice — Legal interest in bringing proceedings)
OJ C 330, 24.12.2005, p. 22–22
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.12.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 330/22 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2005 — Makro Cash & Carry Nederland v Commission
(Case T-258/99) (1)
(State aid - Commission notice on the de minimis rule for State aid - Service stations - Risk of cumulation of aid - Aid covered by the notice - Legal interest in bringing proceedings)
(2005/C 330/55)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant(s): Makro Cash & Carry Nederland BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: I. Cath, K. Tattersall and R. Blaauboer, lawyers)
Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially G. Rozet and H. Speyart, Agents, assisted by J.C.M. van der Beek and L. Hancher, lawyers, and subsequently G. Rozet and H. van Vliet, Agents)
Application for
Annulment of Commission Decision 1999/705/EC of 20 July 1999 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for 633 Dutch service stations located near the German border (OJ 1999 L 280, p. 87)
Operative part of the Order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
|
2. |
The applicant shall bear the costs. |