This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/330/53
Case T-96/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Cwik v Commission (Officials — Evaluation exercise 2001/2002 — Career development report — Application for annulment — Plea of illegality — Manifest errors of assessment — Errors of fact — Psychological harassment — Compensation for damage suffered — Non-material damage)
Case T-96/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Cwik v Commission (Officials — Evaluation exercise 2001/2002 — Career development report — Application for annulment — Plea of illegality — Manifest errors of assessment — Errors of fact — Psychological harassment — Compensation for damage suffered — Non-material damage)
Case T-96/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Cwik v Commission (Officials — Evaluation exercise 2001/2002 — Career development report — Application for annulment — Plea of illegality — Manifest errors of assessment — Errors of fact — Psychological harassment — Compensation for damage suffered — Non-material damage)
OJ C 330, 24.12.2005, p. 21–22
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.12.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 330/21 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Cwik v Commission
(Case T-96/04) (1)
(Officials - Evaluation exercise 2001/2002 - Career development report - Application for annulment - Plea of illegality - Manifest errors of assessment - Errors of fact - Psychological harassment - Compensation for damage suffered - Non-material damage)
(2005/C 330/53)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant(s): Michael Cwik (Tervuren, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and E. de Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)
Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and H. Krämer, Agents)
Application for
Annulment of the decision of the Commission confirming the applicant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and payment of symbolic damages for the non-material damage alleged
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1) |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2) |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |