Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/330/05

    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2005 in Case C-334/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 90/388/EEC — Telecommunications — Article 4d — Rights of way — Lack of a guarantee of non-discrimination in the grant of rights of way — Non-transposition)

    OJ C 330, 24.12.2005, p. 3–3 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.12.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 330/3


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

    (First Chamber)

    of 20 October 2005

    in Case C-334/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 90/388/EEC - Telecommunications - Article 4d - Rights of way - Lack of a guarantee of non-discrimination in the grant of rights of way - Non-transposition)

    (2005/C 330/05)

    Language of the case: Portuguese

    In Case C-334/03 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: A. Alves Vieira, S. Rating and G. Braga da Cruz) v Portuguese Republic (Agents: L. Fernandes and P. de Pitta e Cunha) — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 30 July 2003 — the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, K. Schiemann, N. Colneric (Rapporteur), J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and E. Levits, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 October 2005, in which it:

    1.

    Declares that, by failing to ensure the transposition of Article 4d of Commission Directive 90/388/EEC of 28 June 1990 on competition in the markets for telecommunications services, as amended by Commission Directive 96/19/EC of 13 March 1996, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations;

    2.

    Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 251, de 18.10.2003.


    Top