This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/296/13
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2005 in Case C-379/04: reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Würzburg, Richard Dahms GmbH v Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV (Wine sector products — Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 — Article 21 — Direct effect — Wine and sparkling wine competitions — Competition entry fee)
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2005 in Case C-379/04: reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Würzburg, Richard Dahms GmbH v Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV (Wine sector products — Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 — Article 21 — Direct effect — Wine and sparkling wine competitions — Competition entry fee)
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2005 in Case C-379/04: reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Würzburg, Richard Dahms GmbH v Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV (Wine sector products — Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 — Article 21 — Direct effect — Wine and sparkling wine competitions — Competition entry fee)
OJ C 296, 26.11.2005, p. 7–7
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.11.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/7 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Third Chamber)
of 13 October 2005
in Case C-379/04: reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Würzburg, Richard Dahms GmbH v Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV (1)
(Wine sector products - Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 - Article 21 - Direct effect - Wine and sparkling wine competitions - Competition entry fee)
(2005/C 296/13)
Language of the case: German
In Case C-379/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Landgericht Würzburg (Germany), made by decision of 23 August 2004, received at the Court on 3 September 2004, in the proceedings between Richard Dahms GmbH and Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV, — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola, A. Borg Barthet, U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur) and A. Ó Caoimh, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 October 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 of 29 April 2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products must be interpreted as meaning that entrants or potential entrants to a wine competition cannot rely on that provision to contest the conditions for the organisation of that competition and, in particular, the rules determining the entry fees.