This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/296/50
Case T-140/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2005 — Ehcon v Commission (Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Rejection of tenderer's offer — Non-contractual liability — Limitation period — Inadmissibility — Action clearly unfounded)
Case T-140/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2005 — Ehcon v Commission (Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Rejection of tenderer's offer — Non-contractual liability — Limitation period — Inadmissibility — Action clearly unfounded)
Case T-140/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2005 — Ehcon v Commission (Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Rejection of tenderer's offer — Non-contractual liability — Limitation period — Inadmissibility — Action clearly unfounded)
OJ C 296, 26.11.2005, p. 23–23
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.11.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 296/23 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 September 2005 — Ehcon v Commission
(Case T-140/04) (1)
(Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Rejection of tenderer's offer - Non-contractual liability - Limitation period - Inadmissibility - Action clearly unfounded)
(2005/C 296/50)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant(s): Adviesbureau Ehcon BV (Reeuwijk, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Goedkoop, lawyer)
Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Parpala and E. Manhaeve, Agents)
Application for
compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant because of the rejection of its tender under a call for tenders, published on 10 April 1996 (OJ 1996 C 232, p. 35), for services in relation to Council Directive 80/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 relating to the quality of water intended for human consumption (OJ 1980 L 229, p. 11).
Operative part of the Order
1. |
The action is dismissed as partly inadmissible and partly clearly without foundation. |
2. |
The applicant is to pay the costs. |