Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/193/05

    Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 June 2005 in Case C-105/03, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), in criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino (Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Articles 34 EU and 35 EU — Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA — Standing of victims in criminal proceedings — Protection of vulnerable persons — Hearing of minors as witnesses — Effects of a framework decision)

    OJ C 193, 6.8.2005, p. 3–4 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.8.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 193/3


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

    (Grand Chamber)

    of 16 June 2005

    in Case C-105/03, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), in criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino (1)

    (Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Articles 34 EU and 35 EU - Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA - Standing of victims in criminal proceedings - Protection of vulnerable persons - Hearing of minors as witnesses - Effects of a framework decision)

    (2005/C 193/05)

    Language of the case: Italian

    In Case C-105/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 35 EU, by the judge in charge of preliminary enquiries at the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), made by decision of 3 February 2003, received at the Court on 5 March 2003, in criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta and A. Borg Barthet, Presidents of Chambers, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), P. Kūris, E. Juhász, G. Arestis and M. Ilešič, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General, L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 June 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

    1.

    Articles 2, 3 and 8(4) of Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that the national court must be able to authorise young children, who, as in this case, claim to have been victims of maltreatment, to give their testimony in accordance with arrangements allowing those children to be guaranteed an appropriate level of protection, for example outside the trial and before it takes place.

    2.

    The national court is required to take into consideration all the rules of national law and to interpret them, so far as possible, in the light of the wording and purpose of the Framework Decision.


    (1)  OJ C 146 of 21.06.2003


    Top