EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/155/21
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 April 2005 in Case T-88/01, Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Measure of individual concern to the applicant)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 April 2005 in Case T-88/01, Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Measure of individual concern to the applicant)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 April 2005 in Case T-88/01, Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Measure of individual concern to the applicant)
OJ C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 11–11
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.6.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 155/11 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 14 April 2005
in Case T-88/01, Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(State aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Measure of individual concern to the applicant)
(2005/C 155/21)
Language of the case: Spanish
In Case T-88/01: Sniace SA, established in Madrid (Spain), represented by J. Baró Fuentes, M. Gómez de Liaño y Botella and F. Rodríguez Carretero, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Triantafyllou and J. Buendía Sierra, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by Republic of Austria (Agents: H. Dossi and M. Burgstaller, with an address for service in Luxembourg), by Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG, established in Heiligenkreuz im Lafnitztal (Austria), and by Land Burgenland (Austria), represented by U. Soltész, lawyer — application for annulment of Commission Decision 2001/102/EC of 19 July 2000 on State aid granted by Austria to Lenzing Lyocell GmbH & Co. KG (OJ 2001 L 38, p. 33) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas, J.D. Cooke, P. Mengozzi and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April 2005, in which it:
1. |
Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
2. |
Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
3. |
Orders the interveners to bear their own costs. |