This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/093/49
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-256/01 Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Selection procedure for the recruitment of temporary agents — Non-admission to the tests — Age limit — Principle of non-discrimination)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-256/01 Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Selection procedure for the recruitment of temporary agents — Non-admission to the tests — Age limit — Principle of non-discrimination)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-256/01 Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Selection procedure for the recruitment of temporary agents — Non-admission to the tests — Age limit — Principle of non-discrimination)
OJ C 93, 16.4.2005, p. 25–25
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.4.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 93/25 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 15 February 2005
in Case T-256/01 Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(Officials - Selection procedure for the recruitment of temporary agents - Non-admission to the tests - Age limit - Principle of non-discrimination)
(2005/C 93/49)
Language of the case: French
In Case T-256/01: Norman Pyres, a former temporary agent of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the ‘Research’ Selection Committee's decisions COM/R/A/14/2000 of 1 December 2000, COM/R/A/07/2000 of 4 December 2000, and COM/R/A/10/2000 of 7 December 2000, not to admit the applicant to the selection procedures organised by the ‘Research’ Directorate General on the ground that he did not satisfy the condition relating to the age limit, — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Labucka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 February 2005, in which it:
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |