This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/006/36
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2004 in Case C-79/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2002/40/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2004 in Case C-79/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2002/40/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2004 in Case C-79/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2002/40/EC — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
OJ C 6, 8.1.2005, p. 19–19
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.1.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/19 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Fifth Chamber)
of 18 November 2004
in Case C-79/04 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/40/EC - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
(2005/C 6/36)
Language of the case: French
In Case C-79/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Patakia and B. Schima) v Grand Duchy of Luxemboug (Agent: S. Schreiner) – action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 19 February 2004 – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann and J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur), Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 18 November 2004, in which it:
1. |
Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2002/40/EC of 8 May 2002 implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to energy labelling of household electric ovens, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
2. |
Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |