Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2004/300/84

    Case T-333/04: Action brought on 11 August 2004 by House of Donuts International against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    OJ C 300, 4.12.2004, p. 42–43 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.12.2004   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 300/42

    Action brought on 11 August 2004 by House of Donuts International against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    (Case T-333/04)

    (2004/C 300/84)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 August 2004 by House of Donuts International, George Town, Grand Cayman (British West Indies) represented by N. Decker, lawyer with an address for service in Luxembourg.

    Panrico S.A. was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare that the Community Trade Mark application No. 474 486 of the applicant has to be accepted;

    —

    annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the OHMI of 12 May 2004 (Case R 1034/2001-4);

    —

    order the opponent to bear the costs incurred by the applicant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments:

    Applicant for Community trade mark:

    The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned:

    The figurative mark AHouse of donuts@ for goods and services in classes 30, 32 and 42 (e.g. doughnuts, muffins, croissants, mineral and aerated waters and restaurant, cafeteria and catering services) B application No. 474 486

    Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

    Panrico S.A.

    Trade mark or sign cited in opposition:

    The Spanish word marks and figurative marks ADONUT@ and Adonuts@ for goods and services in classes 30, 32 and 42 (e.g. all kinds of confectionary, pastry, sweets and candies, fruit drinks and fruits juices and services of cafeteria, bar, restaurant, hotel and camping)

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Rejection of the trade mark application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Dismissal of the applicant=s appeal

    Pleas in law:

    The trade marks in competition are not similar. The opponent should not be granted the exclusive use of the words Adonut@ or Adonuts@.
    Top