Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/228/17

    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 July 2004 in Case C-443/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pordenone): Nicolas Schreiber (Article 28 EC — Directive 98/8/EC — Placing of biocidal products on the market — National measure requiring authorisation for the placing on the market of blocks of red cedar wood having natural anti-moth properties)

    OJ C 228, 11.9.2004, p. 9–10 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.9.2004   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 228/9


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

    (First Chamber)

    of 15 July 2004

    in Case C-443/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pordenone): Nicolas Schreiber (1)

    (Article 28 EC - Directive 98/8/EC - Placing of biocidal products on the market - National measure requiring authorisation for the placing on the market of blocks of red cedar wood having natural anti-moth properties)

    (2004/C 228/17)

    Language of the case: Italian

    In Case C-443/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Tribunale di Pordenone (Italy) for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings before that court against Nicolas Schreiber — on the interpretation of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ 1998 L 123, p. 1), and Article 28 EC — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr, R. Silva de Lapuerta and K. Lenaerts, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

    1.

    Article 3(2)(ii) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market does not preclude a Member State from requiring prior authorisation for the marketing of blocks of red cedar wood having natural anti-moth properties.

    Such blocks cannot be classed as a product containing only a ‘basic substance’ such that they may be placed on the market in Italy without prior authorisation or registration, but must be classed as a ‘biocidal product’ within the meaning of Directive 98/8.

    2.

    Article 4(1) of Directive 98/8 does not preclude a Member State from requiring prior authorisation for the marketing of blocks of red cedar wood having natural anti-moth properties, which have been lawfully placed on the market in another Member State in which there is no requirement of authorisation or registration.

    3.

    The fact that a Member State requires prior authorisation for the marketing of blocks of red cedar wood having natural anti-moth properties, which have been lawfully placed on the market in another Member State in which there is no requirement of authorisation or registration, constitutes a measure having equivalent effect contrary to Article 28 EC, which may nevertheless be regarded as justified on grounds of the protection of public health under Article 30 EC.


    (1)  OJ C 31 of 8.2.2003.


    Top