Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 52004XX0421(01)

    Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/E.1/36.212 — Carbonless Paper (prepared under Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of referene of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)

    OJ C 96, 21.4.2004, p. 39–39 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

    52004XX0421(01)

    Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/E.1/36.212 — Carbonless Paper (prepared under Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of referene of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)

    Official Journal C 096 , 21/04/2004 P. 0039 - 0039


    Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/E.1/36.212 - Carbonless Paper

    (prepared under Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of referene of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21))

    (2004/C 96/05)

    (Text with EEA relevance)

    The right of the undertakings to be heard has been respected. The procedure has progressed in due form for both written and oral phases, during which parties have been heard in the hearing of 28 March 2001.

    On this occasion, it appeared that evidence of the infringements as described in the statement of objections was insufficient for the last part of the period 1992-1997.

    In these circumstances, in calculating the fine, the Directorate General for Competition draw the necessary conclusions regardig the duration of the infringements as suggested by the Hearing Officer. As a result, the fine has been calculated on the basis of elements showing clear evidence, i.e. until September 1995.

    Done at Brussels, 5 December 2001.

    Serge Durande

    Top