This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2003/146/20
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2003 in Case C-14/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État): ATRAL SA v Belgian State, (Free movement of goods — Alarm systems and networks — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Interpretation of Directives 73/23/EEC, 89/336/EEC and 1999/5/EEC — Compatibility of national legislation making marketing subject to a prior approval procedure)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2003 in Case C-14/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État): ATRAL SA v Belgian State, (Free movement of goods — Alarm systems and networks — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Interpretation of Directives 73/23/EEC, 89/336/EEC and 1999/5/EEC — Compatibility of national legislation making marketing subject to a prior approval procedure)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2003 in Case C-14/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État): ATRAL SA v Belgian State, (Free movement of goods — Alarm systems and networks — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Interpretation of Directives 73/23/EEC, 89/336/EEC and 1999/5/EEC — Compatibility of national legislation making marketing subject to a prior approval procedure)
OJ C 146, 21.6.2003, p. 12–12
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)