EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92002E002777

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2777/02 by Robert Goebbels (PSE) to the Commission. Environmental impact directive and the subsidiarity principle.

OJ C 110E, 8.5.2003, p. 103–103 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92002E2777

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2777/02 by Robert Goebbels (PSE) to the Commission. Environmental impact directive and the subsidiarity principle.

Official Journal 110 E , 08/05/2003 P. 0103 - 0103


WRITTEN QUESTION E-2777/02

by Robert Goebbels (PSE) to the Commission

(3 October 2002)

Subject: Environmental impact directive and the subsidiarity principle

The Commission has recently taken action against France, the United Kingdom, Italy and Austria for failing to comply with the provisions of the directive on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Whilst such action by the Commission is based on Community texts adopted in due form, there is increasingly a question mark over whether the environmental impact directive is still in accordance with the subsidiarity principle. The directive concerned in fact predates the Maastricht Treaty, which enshrines the principle that the Community shall take action only if and insofar as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States;

It seems clear to me that local or regional authorities or national parliaments are in a better position than the Commission to assess the usefulness and the environmental impact of a waste treatment facility, a land consolidation project or an urban bypass project. In referring such matters to the Court of Justice or in sending a reasoned opinion to the Member States, the Commission is in general effectively acting as the instrument of a few local opponents of such projects, who use all kinds of procedures to delay the construction of infrastructure regarded as necessary by the democratically elected authorities.

Is it not high time that the Commission, as a whole, put an end to this war of litigation, which is contrary to the public interest as determined by the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, and submitted proposals for amending the environmental impact directive in order to respect the subsidiarity principle?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(8 November 2002)

The Commission has the task of ensuring the correct application of Community law, within the powers conferred on it by the EC Treaty. On the basis of Article 211 of the EC Treaty, in order to ensure the proper functioning and development of the common market, the Commission shall ensure that the provisions of this Treaty and the measures taken by the institutions pursuant thereto are applied. In the light of the above, the Commission takes all necessary measures, including infringement procedures under Article 226 of the EC Treaty, in order to ensure the observance of Community law. The Commission's mission under Article 211 of the EC Treaty is not affected by the subsidiarity principle.

In particular, as regards the specific issue raised by the Honourable Member, the Commission agrees that local authorities are better placed to carry out the assessments about the usefulness of a project or about its impact on the environment. Only the competent authorities of the Member State are responsible for carrying out the procedures, assessments and determinations provided for by Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment(1) whether before or after amendment by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997(2). However, the Commission considers itself to be well placed, and entitled, to verify and ensure that these procedures, assessments and determinations, which are carried out at the appropriate level, are in compliance with Community law and in particular with Directive 85/337/EEC.

In addition, it may be pointed out that Directive 97/11/EC, which has strenghtened the provisions of Directive 85/337/EEC, was adopted in March 1997, after ratification or coming into force of the Maastricht Treaty.

(1) OJ L 175, 5.7.1985.

(2) OJ L 73, 14.3.1997.

Top