EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 91998E002648

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2648/98 by John McCARTIN to the Commission. Export of pig offal from Northern Ireland

OJ C 182, 28.6.1999, p. 15 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

91998E2648

WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2648/98 by John McCARTIN to the Commission. Export of pig offal from Northern Ireland

Official Journal C 182 , 28/06/1999 P. 0015


WRITTEN QUESTION E-2648/98

by John McCartin (PPE) to the Commission

(1 September 1998)

Subject: Export of pig offal from Northern Ireland

Is the Commission aware that the Irish Department of Agriculture has refused to grant import licences to companies in Ireland wishing to import pig offal from Northern Ireland, despite the North Ireland authorities clearly stating that the material in question (sourced from porcine animals) is not included under Commission Decision 97/534(1) as amended by Council Decision 98/248(2) on specified risk material? Can the Commission state whether this refusal is contrary to Community law on free trade?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(12 October 1998)

The Commission was unaware, prior to the receipt of the Honourable Member's question, of any particular problems concerning the movement of porcine offal from Northern Ireland to Ireland. The Commission will contact the national authorities in order to obtain details of the situation.

It should be noted that the Community decisions mentioned by the Honourable Member are not applicable, because they do not apply to porcine meat or offal, and in any case the date for applicability has been postponed until 1 January 1999 by the latter decision. In the case of porcine offal fit for human consumption, free circulation is governed by Council Directive 95/23/EC of 22 June 1995 amending Directive 64/433/EEC on conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat(3). Other provisions apply to products not fit for human consumption.

Once the factual background is clarified, the Commission will examine whether the action by the Irish authorities necessitates its further intervention.

(1) OJ L 216, 8.8.1997, p. 95.

(2) OJ L 102, 2.4.1998, p. 26.

(3) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995.

Top