Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 91998E003023

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3023/98 by Sérgio RIBEIRO to the Commission. Harmful environmental effects stemming from Community financial support (Cerâmica do Olival at Olival/ Ourém and Preceram at Travasso/Pombal, Portugal)

    OJ C 96, 8.4.1999, p. 157 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

    European Parliament's website

    91998E3023

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3023/98 by Sérgio RIBEIRO to the Commission. Harmful environmental effects stemming from Community financial support (Cerâmica do Olival at Olival/ Ourém and Preceram at Travasso/Pombal, Portugal)

    Official Journal C 096 , 08/04/1999 P. 0157


    WRITTEN QUESTION E-3023/98

    by Sérgio Ribeiro (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

    (8 October 1998)

    Subject: Harmful environmental effects stemming from Community financial support (Cerâmica do Olival at Olival/Ourém and Preceram at Travasso/Pombal, Portugal)

    In two towns within the same region, although not very close to one another (Olival/Ourém and Travasso/Pombal), there used to be, some years ago, two ceramics factories which were regarded by the local people as part of their living and working environment.

    Access to Community funds enabled the two factories - Cerâmica do Olival and Preceram - to implement modernisation programmes. However, what could (and, indeed, began to) be regarded as something beneficial (including by the local people) had an extremely harmful effect on the environment, apparently because of a new type of fuel being used. Plant life and agricultural produce were damaged over several successive years and many people felt that their health was suffering.

    The response to this state of affairs took many different forms: local people demonstrated and protested to official bodies and even to the author of this question, who was able to experience the situation for himself in the towns concerned.

    Those people are now feeling a degree of despair at the futility of their efforts and at the fact that the situation (particularly as regards public health) has not been remedied and is even getting worse. What was once regarded as a benefit (the Community funding provided) is now being blamed for the problems which have arisen.

    Is the Commission aware of this issue? Did it express any opinion regarding the projects and has it (or had it) any control over the use of the funds, with particular regard to the environmental implications thereof?

    Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission

    (4 November 1998)

    The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

    Top