Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.#Case T-171/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.
Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.
Case T-171/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020.
Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Right to property – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality – Presumption of innocence – Plea of illegality.
Case T-171/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:55