This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TO0616
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2020.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark WONDERLAND – Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-616/19.
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2020.
Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark WONDERLAND – Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-616/19.
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2020.
Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union word mark WONDERLAND – Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-616/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:334