Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TJ0500

    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2011.
    Dorma GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ‘doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS’ - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks ‘DORMA’ - Lodging of additional documents on the reputation of the earlier marks in the procedure before the Board of Appeal - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
    Case T-500/10.

    European Court Reports 2011 II-00411*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:679





    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 – Dorma v OHIM – Puertas Doorsa (doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS)

    (Case T-500/10)

    Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark ‘doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS’ – Earlier national and international word and figurative marks ‘DORMA’ – Lodging of additional documents on the reputation of the earlier marks in the procedure before the Board of Appeal – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

    Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 64-66)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2010 (Case R 542/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Dorma GmbH & Co. KG and Puertas Doorsa, SL.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Dorma GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

    Top