EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006CO0363
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 February 2008.#Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia - Generalidad Valenciana v Commission of the European Communities.#Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Representation by a lawyer - Compliance with the essential procedural requirements of the Rules of Procedure - Principle of non-discrimination - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-363/06 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 February 2008.
Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia - Generalidad Valenciana v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Representation by a lawyer - Compliance with the essential procedural requirements of the Rules of Procedure - Principle of non-discrimination - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-363/06 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 February 2008.
Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia - Generalidad Valenciana v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Representation by a lawyer - Compliance with the essential procedural requirements of the Rules of Procedure - Principle of non-discrimination - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-363/06 P.
European Court Reports 2008 I-00032*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2008:99
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 February 2008 – Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia – Generalidad Valenciana
(Case C‑363/06 P)
Appeal – Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice – Representation by a lawyer – Compliance with the essential procedural requirements of the Rules of Procedure – Principle of non-discrimination – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
1. Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 19, third and fourth paras, and 21, second para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 44(6)) (see paras 24-26, 34)
2. Appeals – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where a clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225(1), EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 42)
Re:
| Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 5 July 2006 in Case T-357/05 | Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia – Generalidad Valenciana | v | Commission | , by which the Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible the appellant’s application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 1867 final of 27 June 2005 concerning the reduction of the financial assistance initially granted from the Cohesion Fund to Project Group No 97/11/61/028, concerning the collection and treatment of waste waters on the Mediterranean coast of the Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia (Spain) – Representation by a lawyer – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice. |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the Comunidad Autónoma de Valencia – Generalidad Valenciana to pay the costs. |