Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 61981CO0010

    Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 1981.
    C.J. Farrall v Commission of the European Communities.
    Case 10/81 R.

    European Court Reports 1981 -00717

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1981:60

    61981O0010

    Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 1981. - C.J. Farrall v Commission of the European Communities. - Case 10/81 R.

    European Court reports 1981 Page 00717


    Parties
    Grounds
    Operative part

    Parties


    IN CASE 10/81

    C . J . FARRALL

    AGAINST

    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

    Grounds


    ON 19 JANUARY 1981 MR FARRALL , A FORMER OFFICIAL OF THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , LODGED , WITHOUT BEING REPRESENTED BY A LAWYER , AN APPLICATION CLAIMING THAT THE COURT SHOULD :

    1 . ( 1 ) ANNUL THE DEFENDANT ' S IMPLIED DECISION REJECTING THE APPLICANT ' S COMPLAINT UNDER ARTICLE 90 ( 2 ) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS ;

    ( 2 ) DECLARE THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS INFRINGED ARTICLE 12 OF ANNEX VIII TO THE STAFF REGULATIONS ;

    ( 3 ) ORDER THE DEFENDANT TO PAY TO THE APPLICANT :

    ( A ) DEFAULT INTEREST IN RESPECT OF THE DELAY IN PAYMENT OF THE APPLICANT ' S SEVERANCE GRANT , AMOUNTING TO BFR 632 225 , SUCH INTEREST TO BE CALCULATED FROM 1 SEPTEMBER 1979 TO 21 JANUARY 1980 AT A RATE COMMENSURATE WITH THE PREVAILING UNITED KINGDOM BANK RATE DURING THAT PERIOD , OR AT SUCH RATE AS THE COURT SHALL DECIDE ;

    ( B ) COMPENSATION FOR THE LOSS SUFFERED BY THE APPLICANT THROUGH BEING UNABLE BETWEEN 1 SEPTEMBER 1979 AND 21 JANUARY 1980 TO COMMIT HIMSELF TO THE PURCHASE OF A DWELLING-HOUSE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM , CALCULATED AT BFR 39 450 IN ACCORDANCE WITH A RISE OF 6.24% IN THE UNITED KINGDOM RETAIL PRICE INDEX BETWEEN AUGUST 1979 AND JANUARY 1980 ;

    ( C ) INTEREST ON THE AMOUNTS AWARDED AT ( A ) AND ( B ) ABOVE CALCULATED FROM 21 JANUARY 1980 TO THE DATE OF THE COURT ' S ORDER ;

    ( D ) EXEMPLARY DAMAGES OF BFR 1 ;

    ALTERNATIVELY , MAKE SUCH OTHER OR FURTHER ORDERS AS SEEM EQUITABLE IN ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE ;

    2 . ORDER THE DEFENDANT TO PAY THE COSTS .

    BY A SEPARATE DOCUMENT LODGED ON THE SAME DATE , MR FARRALL MADE , ALSO WITHOUT BEING REPRESENTED BY A LAWYER , AN APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE AND AN APPLICATION FOR LEGAL AID .

    BY A LETTER OF 22 JANUARY 1981 THE REGISTRAR REQUESTED MR FARRALL , IN PURSUANCE OF ARTICLE 38 ( 7 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE , TO PUT HIS APPLICATIONS IN ORDER BY CAUSING THEM TO BE LODGED BY A LAWYER .

    BY A LETTER OF 9 FEBRUARY 1981 MR FARRALL REPLIED THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO COMPLY WITH THAT REQUIREMENT .

    AS MR FARRALL HAS NOT TAKEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT HIS APPLICATIONS IN ORDER THEY SHOULD BE DECLARED INADMISSIBLE AND REMOVED FROM THE COURT ' S REGISTER .

    Operative part


    THE COURT ( SECOND CHAMBER ),

    COMPOSED OF : P . PESCATORE , PRESIDENT OF CHAMBER , O . DUE AND A . CHLOROS , JUDGES ,

    ADVOCATE GENERAL : G . REISCHL

    REGISTRAR : A . VAN HOUTTE

    HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

    1 . THE MAIN APPLICATION , THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE AND THE APPLICATION FOR LEGAL AID ARE INADMISSIBLE .

    2 . THE CASE IS REMOVED FROM THE COURT ' S REGISTER .

    Top