EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0267

Case T-267/13: Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)

OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 14–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 8–8 (HR)

27.7.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/14


Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)

(Case T-267/13)

2013/C 215/19

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda (Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 2295/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the appeal brought by the applicant, it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community trade mark No 9 093 733‘BAUSS’ (word);

order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BAUSS’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 093 733

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative marks with word elements ‘BASS 3 TRES’, ‘BASS 10 DIEZ’ and ‘BASS 20 VEINTE’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009


Top