This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0390
Case C-390/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud lodged on 22 July 2011 — CS AGRO Ronov s.r.o. v Ministerstvo zemědělství
Case C-390/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud lodged on 22 July 2011 — CS AGRO Ronov s.r.o. v Ministerstvo zemědělství
Case C-390/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud lodged on 22 July 2011 — CS AGRO Ronov s.r.o. v Ministerstvo zemědělství
OJ C 311, 22.10.2011, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/07/2011
- Date lodged:
- 22/07/2011
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Czech
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 32006R0320
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
22.10.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 311/18 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud lodged on 22 July 2011 — CS AGRO Ronov s.r.o. v Ministerstvo zemědělství
(Case C-390/11)
2011/C 311/28
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Nejvyšší správní soud
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: CS AGRO Ronov s.r.o.
Defendant: Ministerstvo zemědělství
Questions referred
|
1. |
On a proper interpretation of Article 4a(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006, as inserted by Council Regulation (EC) No 1261/2007 (1), does the commitment to cease delivery of a certain amount of quota beet to the undertaking with which he has concluded a delivery contract in the preceding marketing year mean a unilateral declaration of the grower that he will not deliver sugar beet in the marketing year 2008/2009, or does that commitment mean the written termination of the contractual relationship of the grower with the sugar company concerning deliveries of sugar beet for the said marketing year? |
|
2. |
May the fact that a contractual party uses a step provided for by a directly binding EU legal provision result in the unenforceability of an obligation of that contractual party under a valid private law contract, on condition that, as a result of that fact, the other contractual party is granted funds from the public budget? |
