This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/069/56
Case T-29/07: Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council
Case T-29/07: Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council
Case T-29/07: Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council
OJ C 69, 24.3.2007, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/03/2007; Date of publication
- Author:
- Court of First Instance
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
24.3.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/27 |
Action brought on 9 February 2007 — Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements v Council
(Case T-29/07)
(2007/C 69/56)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Lactalis Gestion Lait and Lactalis Investissements (Laval, France) (represented by: A. Philippart, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
|
— |
rule that the first subparagraph of Article 1 of Council Directive 67/227/EEC, read in the light of the fourth recital in the preamble, requires the Member States to abolish and replace cumulative multi-stage turnover taxes which distort competition and hinder trade between Member States; |
|
— |
rule that subparagraph 3 of Article 1 of Directive 67/227/EEC, read in the light of the eighth recital in the preamble, prohibits Member States (old or new) from maintaining or introducing measure providing for flat-rate equalisation of turnover taxes on importation or exportation in trade between Member States; |
|
— |
rule that Article 1 of First Directive 67/227/EEC replaces cumulative multi-stage taxes with the common system of value added tax and that henceforward the maintenance or introduction of cumulative multi-stage taxes which distort competition and hinder trade must be prohibited; |
|
— |
rule that contrary to the objective that it set, Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, by repealing First Directive 67/227/EEC, gives, with the exception of Article 2 defining the characteristics of VAT, an incomplete and incorrect image of the existing VAT legislation and jeopardises the harmonisation of laws on turnover tax; |
|
— |
rule that by removing all references to the principle of principle of the prohibition on cumulative multi-stage taxes and thereby enabling the maintenance and reintroduction of turnover taxes of such a kind as to distort competition and hinder trade between Member States, the Council infringes the objectives set by Articles 3 and 93 EC and directly and individually affects the applicants' interests; |
|
— |
annul Article 411/1 of Directive 2006/112/EC in so far as it repeals recitals 4 and 8 and subparagraphs 1 and 3 of Article 1 of Council Directive 67/227/EEC and clearly infringes Articles 3 and 93 EC; |
|
— |
order the Council to reimburse the irrecoverable expenses incurred in these proceedings |
Pleas in law and main arguments
By this action, the applicants seek annulment of Article 411/1 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) in so far as it repeals subparagraphs 1 and 3 of Article 1 of First Council Directive 67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (2) providing for the abolition and prohibiting the maintenance or introduction of cumulative multi-stage taxes.
The applicants claim that by adopting such a directive, the Council infringes the objectives of the Treaty set out in Articles 3 and 93 EC which provide for the harmonisation of laws on turnover taxes. The applicants also submit that the repeal of Directive 67/227/EEC by Directive 2006/112/EC calls into question the principle of the prohibition on cumulative multi-stage taxes which the applicants argue are, by their very nature, of such a kind as to distort the conditions of competition and hinder trade between Member States.
