This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/074/31
Case T-147/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 January 2006 — Devinlec v OHIM (Community trade mark — Figurative mark containing the verbal element quantum — Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-147/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 January 2006 — Devinlec v OHIM (Community trade mark — Figurative mark containing the verbal element quantum — Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-147/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 January 2006 — Devinlec v OHIM (Community trade mark — Figurative mark containing the verbal element quantum — Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
OJ C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 16–16
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 25/03/2006; Date of publication
- Author:
- Court of First Instance
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
25.3.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 74/16 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 January 2006 — Devinlec v OHIM
(Case T-147/03) (1)
(Community trade mark - Figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘quantum’ - Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2006/C 74/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties:
Applicant: Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (Toulouse, France) (represented by: J.-P. Simon, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)
Action
brought against against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 (Case R 109/2002-3) relating to opposition proceedings between Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA and T.I.M.E. Art Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 January 2003 (Case R 109/2002-3). |
|
2. |
Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Court. |
|
3. |
Orders the intervener to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
