Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document E2011J0016

Judgment of the Court of 28 January 2013 in Case E-16/11 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes — Obligation of result — Emanation of the State — Discrimination)

OJ C 132, 9.5.2013, p. 11–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
28/01/2013
Date lodged:
15/12/2011
Author:
EFTA Court
Form:
Judicial information
Treaty:
Agreement on the European Economic Area
Link
Link
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited:
Link

9.5.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/11

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 28 January 2013

in Case E-16/11

EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes — Obligation of result — Emanation of the State — Discrimination)

2013/C 132/06

In Case E-16/11, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to ensure payment of the minimum amount of compensation to Icesave depositors in the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom provided for in Article 7(1) of the Act referred to at point 19a of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes) within the time limits laid down in Article 10 of the Act, Iceland has failed to comply with the obligations resulting from that Act, in particular its Articles 3, 4, 7 and 10, and/or Article 4 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Páll Hreinsson and Ola Mestad (ad hoc), Judges, gave judgment on 28 January 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

1.

dismisses the application;

2.

orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to pay its own costs and the costs incurred by Iceland;

3.

orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
Top