Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/129/48

    Case F-37/07: Action brought on 23 April 2007 — Cros v Court of Justice

    OJ C 129, 9.6.2007, p. 28–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    09/06/2007; Date of publication
    Author:
    Civil Service Tribunal
    Form:
    Judicial information

    9.6.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 129/28

    Action brought on 23 April 2007 — Cros v Court of Justice

    (Case F-37/07)

    (2007/C 129/48)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Alexia Cros (Howald, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Reveillaud, lawyer)

    Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of 19 July 2006 appointing the applicant probationary official as a lawyer-linguist with effect from 1 September 2006 in that she is classified at grade AD7;

    —

    Declare and hold that, retroactively to the date of appointment of 1 September 2006, the applicant is to be classified at grade A*10 corresponding to grade LA6 before the entry into force of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities (1);

    —

    Order the full reconstitution of her career with effect retroactively to 1 September 2006;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The applicant submits that the contested decision, based on Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, infringes:

    —

    notice of open competition CJ/LA/24 (2), pursuant to which the recruitment of successful candidates would be made at grade LA7/LA6;

    —

    the principle of equal treatment;

    —

    the principle of legitimate expectations and the principles of sound administration, transparency and the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials.

    (1)  OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

    (2)  OJ C 182 A, 31.7.2002, p. 1.

    Top