Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/131/48

    Case C-310/05: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2001/95/EC — General product safety — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    OJ C 131, 3.6.2006, p. 27–27 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.6.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 131/27


    Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

    (Case C-310/05) (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/95/EC - General product safety - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    (2006/C 131/48)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M.-J. Jonczy and A. Aresu, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (OJ L 11, p. 4)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that directive;

    2.

    Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 243 of 01.10.2005.


    Top