EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/251/03

Case C-246/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof by order of that court of 26 May 2004 in the case Turn- und Sportunion Waldburg against Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol

OJ C 251, 9.10.2004, p. 2–2 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.10.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/2


Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof by order of that court of 26 May 2004 in the case Turn- und Sportunion Waldburg against Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol

(Case C-246/04)

(2004/C 251/03)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Higher Administrative Court) (Austria), of 26 May 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 10 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Turn- und Sportunion Waldburg against Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol.

The Verwaltungsgerichtshof asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following questions:

1.

May a Member State exercise its discretion under Article 13 C of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (‘the directive’) to give taxable persons the right, despite the tax exemption for the letting of property provided for in Article 13 B(b) of the directive, to opt for taxation only in a uniform manner or may the Member State distinguish by reference to the type of turnover or the group of taxable persons?

2.

Does Article 13 B(b) in conjunction with C(a) of the directive permit Member States' legislation, like Paragraph 6(1)(14) of the Umsatzsteuergesetz 1994 (Law on turnover tax; hereinafter ‘UStG 1994’) in conjunction with Paragraph 6(1)(16) of the UStG 1994, under which the possibility of opting for taxation of turnover from leasing and letting is limited in such a way that non-profit-making sport clubs do not have that option?

3.

Does Article 13 B(b) in conjunction with C(a) of the directive permit Member States' legislation, like Paragraph 2(5)(2) of the UStG 1994 in conjunction with Paragraph 1(2)(1) of the version of the Hobbies Order in BGBl Nr 33/1993 (Bundesgesetzblatt; Austrian Official Journal), under which the possibility of opting for taxation of turnover from letting does not exist where the letting does not lead within a foreseeable period of time to an overall profit or surplus in income and concerns a building suitable for use as a private dwelling?


(1)  OJ L 145, p. 1.


Top