Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92001E000401

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0401/01 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Improving safeguards against harmful effects of cholesterol-reducing margarines on some consumer groups.

OJ C 318E, 13.11.2001, p. 43–44 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92001E0401

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0401/01 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Improving safeguards against harmful effects of cholesterol-reducing margarines on some consumer groups.

Official Journal 318 E , 13/11/2001 P. 0043 - 0044


WRITTEN QUESTION E-0401/01

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(15 February 2001)

Subject: Improving safeguards against harmful effects of cholesterol-reducing margarines on some consumer groups

1. Is the Commission aware that margarine manufacturers are promoting some of their new products on the basis that they contain a cholesterol-reducing agent?

2. Does the Commission agree that one effect of such claims can be that, rather than consulting a doctor who will prescribe the right doses of medicines to reduce blood cholesterol levels, some consumers will be tempted to use quantities of a particular margarine that may be too high or too low to achieve the desirable effect attributed to it?

3. Can the Commission confirm that cholesterol-reducing margarines can be harmful to persons with special dietary requirements, in particular pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers and children under five, and to those taking cholesterol-reducing medicines?

4. How does the Commission assess the call by consumer organisations for these so-called target-group products to be displayed in supermarkets only in separate, readily identifiable areas, where they will not be bought inadvertently by those not familiar with their special characteristics?

5. Why has no action been taken hitherto requiring warnings against the harmful effects referred to in paragraph 3 above to be printed in large characters on packaging, and why has such information hitherto either been omitted entirely (e.g. Benecol) or printed in a minuscule font surrounded by a multiplicity of other information (e.g. Becel pro-activ)?

6. Will the Commission act to have it made compulsory for a warning about the harmful effects referred to in paragraph 3 above to be prominently printed in large type?

Joint answer to Written Questions E-0401/01 and E-0402/01 given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(21 May 2001)

A product containing phytosterol-esters has been approved under Regulation (EC) No258/97 of the Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients(1). Under Commission Decision 2000/500/EC of 24 July 2000 on authorising the placing on the market of yellow fat spreads with added phytosterol esters as a novel food

or novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the Parliament and of the Council(2), a claim regarding the effects of phytosterol-esters on blood cholesterol levels has been approved. In addition supplementary labelling requirements for that product were also mandatory.

In the assessment of this product no unacceptable risks for human health have been revealed. However, if regularly eaten the Beta-carotene levels in the blood serum are shown to be lowered, but still remain in the normal range. Therefore, as a precautionary measure it was made compulsory to state on the label that the product is intended for people who wish to control their blood cholesterol and that it is not recommended for pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers and children under five.

Regarding the population in general the Scientific Committee on Food stated in its opinion that Given the overall evaluation of the submitted information the Committee concludes that the use of phytosterol-esters in yellow fat spreads at a maxmium level corresponding to 8 % free phytosterol is safe for human use.

The Commission is aware of the varying rules on claims on foodstuffs. Claims should be truthful and substantiated. For this reason the Commission announced in its White Paper on Food Safety(3) its intention to consider whether specific provisions should be introduced in Community legislation to govern functional claims and nutritional claims on foodstuffs. A discussion paper on this issue will be available shortly, and on the basis of the comments received the Commission intends to prepare a legislative proposal. The Commission foresees to adopt a proposal at the end of 2001.

Under current Community legislation (Article 2 of Directive 2000/13/EC of the Parliament and of the Council, of 20 March 2000, on the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs(4)) the attribution to any foodstuff of the property of preventing, treating or curing a human disease, or reference to such properties, is prohibited.

As for the presentation of the information particulars on the label of foodstuffs, Directive 2000/13/EC does not specify the font to use on the labels of food products. However, it requires all labelling particulars to be easy to understand and marked in a conspicuous place to be easily visible, clearly legible and indelible; they shall not in any way be hidden, obscured or interrupted by other written or pictorial matter.

As far as controls and sanctions are concerned, the Member States, on the basis of Community rules, carry out controls. However, sanctions are strictly the prerogative of Member States.

(1) OJ L 43, 14.2.1997.

(2) OJ L 200, 8.8.2000.

(3) COM(1999) 719 final.

(4) OJ L 109, 6.5.2000.

Top