Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 92000E001190

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1190/00 by Timothy Kirkhope (PPE-DE) to the Commission. European Social Funds.

OJ C 374E, 28.12.2000, p. 209–209 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

Date of document:
10/04/2000; Date of transmission
Date of dispatch:
10/04/2000
Date of reply:
03/05/2000; Written answer
Author:
European Parliament, Not available
Form:
Written question
Addressee:
European Commission
Parliamentary term:
Fifth legislature
Political group:
Group of the European People’s Party

92000E1190

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1190/00 by Timothy Kirkhope (PPE-DE) to the Commission. European Social Funds.

Official Journal 374 E , 28/12/2000 P. 0209 - 0209


WRITTEN QUESTION P-1190/00

by Timothy Kirkhope (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 April 2000)

Subject: European Social Funds

Under the current system of payment for the European Social Fund (ESF), voluntary and community sector projects receive a 50 % advance payment, followed by a further 30 % advance payment (when half of the first advance has been spent). The remaining 20 % is paid after submission of the final claim.

The new system proposed by the Department for Education and Employment will see an advance payment of only 10 % and then projects will have to submit claims in arrears (probably quarterly) to receive further payment. A balance of 20 % will still be withheld for remittance following the final claim.

Can the Commission clarify if it has the right and authority to intervene in the payment of European Social Funds at a national level if the Commission believes the funds are not being allocated in the most effective manner so as to benefit those organisations who deserve and require this funding to survive. It is estimated that at least 90-95 % of the organisations that at present receive ESF will, under the new system of payments, be closed due to lack of funds to support their programmes.

Would it be possible for the Commission to support the alternative payment system that is being put forward by the organisations involved?

They are proposing the Scottish Model whereby:

- Quarter 1: 30 % in advance;

- Quarter 2: 25 % in advance, subject to satisfactory Quarter 1 returns;

- Quarter 3: 25 % in advance, subject to satisfactory Quarter 2 returns;

- Quarter 4: 20 % final payment in arrears, subject to satisfactory audit of all Quarters.

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(3 May 2000)

The responsibility for fixing the detailed rules for the implementation of the European social fund (ESF) within a Member State lies with the managing authority of the programme. The programming documents adopted by the Commission will not contain information on, for example, the amounts to be paid by way of advances to project organisers. In these circumstances, the Commission cannot intervene in this matter.

However, the Department for Education and Employment has recently decided, following discussions within the United Kingdom, to increase the advance payment from 10 % to 30 % of the first year costs of the project for all organisations. The Commission welcomed this decision.

Top