This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TB0385
Case T-385/23: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Case T-385/23: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Case T-385/23: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
OJ C, C/2024/2624, 22.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2624/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 28/02/2024
- Date lodged:
- 07/07/2023
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Romanian
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Applicant:
- Person
- Defendant:
- European Public Prosecutor’s Office, Institutions
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62023TO0385
- Instruments cited in case law:
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/2624 |
22.4.2024 |
Order of the General Court of 28 February 2024 – Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
(Case T-385/23) (1)
(Action for annulment - Decision of a Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to bring a case to judgment - Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Procedural act of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Lack of jurisdiction)
(C/2024/2624)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Şandru and M.-A. Ion, lawyers)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis, F.-R. Radu and E. Farhat, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Tenth Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 8 December 2022 by which it referred the case concerning him for judgment.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA). |
|
3. |
Mr Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși shall bear his own costs and pay those of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, with the exception of those relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
|
4. |
Mr Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși, the Council, the Commission, the Parliament and ECBA shall bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2624/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
