Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023CN0559

    Case C-559/23 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission

    OJ C, C/2023/210, 23.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/210/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/210/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    Series C


    C/2023/210

    23.10.2023

    Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission

    (Case C-559/23 P)

    (C/2023/210)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: International Management Group (IMG) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, avocats)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:

    Set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission;

    Consequently, grant the form of order sought by the appellant at first instance and, accordingly,

    Rule that the European Commission has incurred non-contractual liability;

    Order the respondent to pay compensation for the damage sustained by the appellant, valued, subject to any adjustment, at EUR 10 000 per month for a period beginning in mid-December 2015 and running until delivery of the judgment to be given, in respect of non-material damage, and at EUR 2 100 000 in respect of material damage (to be increased by late payment interest);

    Order the respondent to pay all the costs at first instance and on appeal.

    Grounds of appeal and main arguments

    In support of the appeal, the appellant raises five grounds.

    (1)

    Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and of the concept of a causal link — Breach by the first-instance court of the obligation to state reasons — Infringement of the omnia petita principle

    (2)

    Error of law — Error in the legal characterisation of the facts — Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and the concepts of unlawful conduct and imputability — Distortion of the file

    (3)

    Infringement of the duty of care — Disregard by the court of its obligation to state reasons

    (4)

    Infringement of the duty to act diligently — Infringement of Article 10(3) of Regulation No 883/2013 — Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and of the concept of unlawful conduct

    (5)

    On the request made by the Commission related to the opinion issued by the legal service: infringement of the adversarial principle and of the principle of equality of arms


    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/210/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


    Top