This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0559
Case C-559/23 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission
Case C-559/23 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission
Case C-559/23 P: Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission
OJ C, C/2023/210, 23.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/210/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
C/2023/210 |
23.10.2023 |
Appeal brought on 7 September 2023 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission
(Case C-559/23 P)
(C/2023/210)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: International Management Group (IMG) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:
— |
Set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 28 June 2023 in Case T-752/20, IMG v Commission; |
— |
Consequently, grant the form of order sought by the appellant at first instance and, accordingly, |
— |
Rule that the European Commission has incurred non-contractual liability; |
— |
Order the respondent to pay compensation for the damage sustained by the appellant, valued, subject to any adjustment, at EUR 10 000 per month for a period beginning in mid-December 2015 and running until delivery of the judgment to be given, in respect of non-material damage, and at EUR 2 100 000 in respect of material damage (to be increased by late payment interest); |
— |
Order the respondent to pay all the costs at first instance and on appeal. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellant raises five grounds.
(1) |
Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and of the concept of a causal link — Breach by the first-instance court of the obligation to state reasons — Infringement of the omnia petita principle |
(2) |
Error of law — Error in the legal characterisation of the facts — Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and the concepts of unlawful conduct and imputability — Distortion of the file |
(3) |
Infringement of the duty of care — Disregard by the court of its obligation to state reasons |
(4) |
Infringement of the duty to act diligently — Infringement of Article 10(3) of Regulation No 883/2013 — Infringement of Article 340 TFEU and of the concept of unlawful conduct |
(5) |
On the request made by the Commission related to the opinion issued by the legal service: infringement of the adversarial principle and of the principle of equality of arms |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/210/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)