Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023CN0076

Case C-76/23, Cobult: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2023 — Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA

OJ C 189, 30.5.2023, p. 10–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

30.5.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/10


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2023 — Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA

(Case C-76/23, Cobult)

(2023/C 189/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cobult UG

Defendant: TAP Air Portugal SA

Question referred

Must Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a signed agreement of the passenger on the reimbursement of the cost of the ticket with a travel voucher within the meaning of the first indent of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 exists where the passenger selects a voucher of this type on the website of the operating air carrier to the exclusion of a subsequent refund of the cost of the ticket in monetary form and receives it by email, while reimbursement of the cost of the ticket in monetary form is only possible after first contacting the operating air carrier?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).


Top