Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0657

    Case T-657/22: Action brought on 27 October 2022 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN)

    OJ C 472, 12.12.2022, p. 48–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    27/10/2022
    Date lodged:
    27/10/2022
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Defendant:
    European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    12.12.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 472/48

    Action brought on 27 October 2022 — moderne Stadt v EUIPO (DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN)

    (Case T-657/22)

    (2022/C 472/56)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Simon and L. Daams, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN’ — Application No 18 401 434

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2022 in Case R 2196/2021-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of the principle of equal treatment.
    Top