This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0662
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2023.#Zalina Tavitova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AURUS – International registration of the earlier word mark AUDAS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-662/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2023.
Zalina Tavitova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AURUS – International registration of the earlier word mark AUDAS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-662/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2023.
Zalina Tavitova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark AURUS – International registration of the earlier word mark AUDAS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-662/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:393
- Date of document:
- 12/07/2023
- Date lodged:
- 31/10/2022
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Third countries
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded, Action for annulment - inadmissible
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Steinfatt
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62022TA0662
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 1
- 32015Q0423(01)-A182P1: N 19
- 32015Q0423(01)-A182P2: N 19
- 32017R1001-A72P2: N 15
- 32017R1001-A72P3: N 15 16
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 6 10 20 21 23 24
- 32017R1001: N 66
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 101
- 61997CJ0039-N23: N 35
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 22
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 22
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 22
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 22
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 101
- 62003TJ0081-N76: N 24
- 62003TJ0112-N70: N 85
- 62003TJ0169-N60: N 46
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 71
- 62005CJ0412-N65: N 66
- 62006TJ0175-N70: N 40
- 62006TJ0175-N68: N 43
- 62006TJ0175: N 44
- 62006TJ0175-N31: N 85
- 62006TJ0259-N33: N 63
- 62006TJ0303(01)-N54: N 85
- 62007TJ0085-N17: N 15
- 62007TJ0316-N42: N 23
- 62007TJ0430-N33: N 67
- 62007TJ0430-N35: N 67
- 62009TJ0011-N13: N 17
- 62009TJ0011-N14: N 17
- 62010TJ0028-N13: N 16
- 62010TJ0584-N49: N 44
- 62011TJ0249-N21: N 35
- 62013TJ0627-N37: N 57
- 62014TJ0135-N18: N 17
- 62014TJ0135-N19: N 17
- 62016TJ0095-N14: N 17
- 62016TJ0095-N16: N 17
- 62016TJ0095-N18: N 17
- 62016TJ0184-N31: N 18
- 62016TJ0184-N32: N 19
- 62016TJ0824-N20: N 18
- 62016TJ0824-N21: N 19
- 62017TJ0150-N68: N 57
- 62018TJ0467-N39: N 78
- 62019TJ0601-N102: N 40 44 48
- 62019TJ0601-N103: N 48
- 62020TJ0673-N34: N 40 44 48
- 62022TJ0306-N59: N 102
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
