Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0763

    Case T-763/21: Action brought on 7 December 2021 — SE v Commission

    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 73, 14.2.2022, p. 15–15 (GA)

    Date of document:
    07/12/2021
    Date lodged:
    07/12/2021
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for damages, Staff cases

    14.2.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 73/50

    Action brought on 7 December 2021 — SE v Commission

    (Case T-763/21)

    (2022/C 73/63)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: SE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decision dated 23 April 2021 to reject the applicant’s candidacy to the Junior Professional Pilot program (hereinafter ‘JPP program’);

    —

    annul, insofar as necessary, the decision dated 27 August 2021 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 27 April 2021;

    —

    order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to be reclassified as a temporary agent AD 5 as from 1 October 2021, as estimated in the application;

    —

    order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to become a permanent official based on participation in internal competitions restricted to temporary agents at AD level, as estimated in the application;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the entire costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging age discrimination, in violation of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, Article 1d of the Staff Regulations and Article 10(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging abuse of mandate and/or lack of competence.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging that the call for expressions of interest is illegal.
    Top