Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62021TN0540

Case T-540/21: Action brought on 2 September 2021 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE)

OJ C 431, 25.10.2021, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
02/09/2021
Date lodged:
02/09/2021
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Defendant:
European Union Intellectual Property Office
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

25.10.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/50

Action brought on 2 September 2021 — Vivostore v EUIPO — Linda (VIVO LIFE)

(Case T-540/21)

(2021/C 431/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Vivostore Ltd (Winscombe, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. Urek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Linda AG (Cologne, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark VIVO LIFE — Application for registration No 18 049 468

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2021 in Case R 1587/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul or vary the contested decision and uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO in Case B 3 090 390 of 16 July 2020;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top