This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0454
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-454/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.
G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-454/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.
G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-454/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:591
- Date of document:
- 28/09/2022
- Date lodged:
- 30/07/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Luxembourg
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-732/22 P
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Spielmann
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62021TA0454
- Review of judgement requested by 62022CN0732
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 1
- 32009R0207: N 16 69
- 32009R0207-A41: N 6
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 9 10 17 18 20 22 74
- 32017R1001: N 16
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 17
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 67
- 62001TJ0006-N35: N 34
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 21
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 21
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 21
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 21
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 67
- 62003TJ0312-N37: N 37
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 25
- 62005CJ0334-N41: N 26
- 62005CJ0334-N42: N 26
- 62005CJ0412-N65: N 69
- 62006CJ0193-N43: N 26
- 62007TJ0316-N42: N 22
- 62010CJ0610-N45: N 16
- 62012CJ0591-N12: N 16
- 62013TJ0581-N41: N 27
- 62016TJ0103-N48: N 35
- 62017CJ0705-N53: N 27
- 62018CJ0702-N2: N 16
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
