EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0467
Case T-467/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark Lío — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-467/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark Lío — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-467/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark Lío — Absolute ground for invalidity — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 472, 12.12.2022, p. 38–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 472/38 |
Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO — Nube (Lío)
(Case T-467/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union figurative mark Lío - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 472/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DBM Videovertrieb GmbH (Wesel, Germany) (represented by: J. Fusbahn and D. Dawirs, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: N. Lamsters and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nube, SL (Ibiza, Spain) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and R. Ahijón Lana, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2021 (Case R 1220/2020-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders DBM Videovertrieb GmbH to pay the costs. |