EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0293
Case T-293/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission
Case T-293/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission
Case T-293/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission
OJ C 222, 6.7.2020, p. 43–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 222/43 |
Action brought on 18 May 2020 — Ruiz-Ruiz v Commission
(Case T-293/20)
(2020/C 222/47)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz (Alkmaar, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of 23 May 2019 by which the applicant was excluded from competition EPSO/AD/371/19 on the ground of lack of professional experience; |
— |
annul the decision of 20 September 2019 rejecting the request for review of the applicant’s exclusion from competition EPSO/AD/371/19; |
— |
annul the decision of 7 February 2020 dismissing the administrative appeal brought under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and breach of the competition notice.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of equal treatment.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons and failure to observe the connected principle of equality of the parties in proceedings (Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights).
|