This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0619
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Annual and interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-619/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.
FJ and Others v European External Action Service.
Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Annual and interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment.
Case T-619/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.
FJ and Others v European External Action Service.
Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Annual and interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment.
Case T-619/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:901
- Date of document:
- 15/12/2021
- Date lodged:
- 05/10/2020
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-171/22 P
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Staff cases - unfounded, Staff cases - inadmissible
- Applicant:
- Official of the European Union
- Defendant:
- European External Action Service, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Pynnä
- Treaty:
- Merger Treaty
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62020TA0619
- Review of judgement requested by 62022CN0171
- Confirmed by 62022CO0171
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E/PRO/03-A53L1: N 87
- 12008E/PRO/03-A21L1: N 87 90
- 31968R0259(01)-A64: N 1 4 16 19 49 53 58 72
- 31968R0259(01)-N10A12: N 12 13
- 31968R0259(01)-A65: N 2 4 7 49 55 58
- 31968R0259(01)-A90P2: N 20
- 31968R0259(01)-N10: N 3 16 19
- 31968R0259(01)-N11: N 4 16 19 58
- 31968R0259(01)-N11A04: N 56
- 31968R0259(01)-N11A05: N 56
- 31968R0259(01)-N11A06: N 56
- 31968R0259(01)-N11A07: N 56
- 31968R0259(01)-N12L2: N 6
- 31968R0259(02)-A92: N 1 2
- 31968R0259(02)-A20: N 1 2 4
- 31968R0259(02)-A118: N 3
- 32013R1023: N 1
- 32015Q0423(01)-A106: N 29
- 32015Q0423(01)-A85: N 30
- 32015Q0423(01)-A88: N 30
- 32015Q0423(01)-A130P1: N 37
- 32015Q0423(01)-A76LD: N 87 90
- 32015Q0423(01): N 88
- 52019XC1213(02): N 18
- 52019XC1213(03): N 18
- 61993TJ0544-N64: N 57
- 61997TJ0175-N4: N 54
- 61997TJ0175-N65: N 67
- 62000TJ0201-N45: N 53
- 62000TJ0201-N64: N 57
- 62000TJ0201-N47: N 58
- 62000TJ0201-N48: N 59
- 62000TJ0201-N49: N 64
- 62011TJ0538-N131: N 88
- 62013TJ0304-N66: N 58
- 62013TJ0304-N67: N 59
- 62013TJ0304-N68: N 64
- 62015FJ0056-N37: N 39
- 62016TJ0148-N64: N 55
- 62016TJ0148-N72: N 56
- 62016TJ0148-N73: N 56
- 62019TJ0698: N 15
- 62019TJ0698-N54: N 66
- 62019TJ0698-N56: N 70
- 62019TJ0698-N58: N 72
- 62019TJ0698-N59: N 73
- 62019TJ0698-N65: N 81
- 62019TJ0698-N69: N 84
- 62019TJ0699: N 15
- 62019TO0308-N34: N 87
- 62019TO0728-N64: N 88
- 62020TO0619: N 28
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
