EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0065
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Kneissl Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark KNEISSL – Partial revocation – No genuine use of the mark – Extent of use – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Abuse of rights.#Case T-65/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.
Kneissl Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark KNEISSL – Partial revocation – No genuine use of the mark – Extent of use – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Abuse of rights.
Case T-65/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.
Kneissl Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark KNEISSL – Partial revocation – No genuine use of the mark – Extent of use – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) – Abuse of rights.
Case T-65/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:462
- Date of document:
- 14/07/2021
- Date lodged:
- 04/02/2020
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Austria
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Perišin
- Treaty:
- Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62020TA0065
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 31994R0040: N 1 25
- 31995R2868-R22P3: N 25
- 32009R0207: N 18
- 32009R0207-A51: N 20 21 24 29
- 32009R0207-A78P1LF: N 25
- 32009R0207-A51P1LA: N 5 19 22
- 32009R0207-A56P1LA: N 76
- 32009R0207-A58: N 8
- 32009R0207-A59: N 8
- 32009R0207-A60: N 8
- 32009R0207-A61: N 8
- 32009R0207-A62: N 8
- 32009R0207-A63: N 8
- 32009R0207-A64: N 8
- 32017R1001: N 18
- 32017R1001-A18: N 19
- 32017R1001-A58P1LA: N 19
- 62001TJ0334-N36: N 28
- 62004CJ0416-N71: N 31
- 62004CJ0416: N 51
- 62004CJ0416-N77: N 52
- 62004CJ0416-N78: N 53
- 62004CJ0416-N68: N 54
- 62006TJ0169-N36: N 30
- 62006TJ0325-N30: N 27
- 62007TJ0409-N36: N 28
- 62009TJ0030: N 58 64 67
- 62009TJ0030-N43: N 65 66
- 62009TJ0030-N42: N 66
- 62009TJ0030-N44: N 66
- 62009TJ0427-N28: N 27
- 62010CJ0610-N45: N 18
- 62013TJ0345-N21: N 26
- 62015TJ0431-N26: N 32
- 62015TJ0431-N27: N 33
- 62015TJ0431-N28: N 34
- 62017CJ0194-N83: N 26
- 62017CJ0668-N3: N 18
- 62018CJ0223-N2: N 18
- 62018TJ0668-N77: N 29
- 62019TJ0577-N75: N 76
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
