This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TJ0886
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – LED lighting sector – Patent Licensing Program – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons – No EU interest – Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement.#Case T-886/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.
Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v European Commission.
Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – LED lighting sector – Patent Licensing Program – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons – No EU interest – Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement.
Case T-886/19.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.
Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v European Commission.
Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – LED lighting sector – Patent Licensing Program – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons – No EU interest – Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement.
Case T-886/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:442
- Date of document:
- 13/07/2022
- Date lodged:
- 28/12/2019
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Italy
- Form:
- Judgment
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- European Commission, EU institutions and bodies
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Kreuschitz
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62019TA0886
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12007P017-P2: N 85
- 12007P041-P2LC: N 68
- 12007P047-P1: N 53
- 12007P047: N 85
- 12008E101: N 1 - 102
- 12008E101-P1: N 20
- 12008E102: N 1 - 102
- 12008E105: N 29 31
- 12008E105-P1: N 38 43
- 12008E106: N 33
- 12008E263: N 1 53
- 12008E296-L2: N 68
- 12008M019-P1L2: N 52
- 32003R0001-A07P1: N 3
- 32003R0001: N 33
- 32004L0048: N 85
- 32004R0773: N 33
- 32004R0773-A07P2: N 7 32
- 32015R1589-A04P3: N 43
- 61981CJ0246-N15: N 31
- 61981CJ0246-N16: N 31
- 61981CJ0246-N17: N 31
- 61981CJ0246: N 33
- 61990TJ0024-N73: N 38
- 61990TJ0024-N83: N 38
- 61990TJ0024-N86: N 40 44 45
- 61990TJ0024-N74: N 43
- 61990TJ0024-N85: N 53
- 61991CJ0241-N46: N 73
- 61994TJ0374: N 96
- 61995CJ0282-N36: N 32
- 61995CJ0282-N37: N 32
- 61997CJ0119-N86: N 32 40
- 61997CJ0119-N88: N 38
- 61997CJ0119-N79: N 48
- 61997CJ0119-N80: N 49
- 61998CJ0450-N47: N 49
- 61998TJ0062: N 94
- 62004CJ0095: N 89
- 62004TJ0201: N 80
- 62005CJ0075-N59: N 43
- 62005TJ0060-N189: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N190: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N191: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N192: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N193: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N194: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N195: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0060-N196: N 31 33
- 62005TJ0306-N187: N 46
- 62005TJ0306-N188: N 46
- 62005TJ0306-N189: N 46
- 62005TJ0306-N190: N 46
- 62007CJ0425-N33: N 48
- 62007CJ0425-N53: N 51
- 62007TJ0104-N218: N 45
- 62008TJ0427-N65: N 56
- 62009TO0273-N35: N 47
- 62009TO0273-N51: N 47
- 62009TO0273-N52: N 47
- 62013CJ0170-N57: N 85
- 62013CJ0170-N58: N 85
- 62013CJ0170-N61: N 86
- 62013CJ0170-N63: N 86
- 62013CJ0170-N66: N 86
- 62014CJ0431-N68: N 43
- 62014CJ0526: N 43
- 62014TJ0691: N 63
- 62014TJ0691-N1304: N 73
- 62014TJ0699-N62: N 43
- 62014TJ0699-N64: N 44
- 62014TJ0699-N80: N 67
- 62014TJ0699-N81: N 67
- 62015TJ0480-N34: N 38 43
- 62015TJ0480-N37: N 39
- 62015TJ0480-N35: N 39 43
- 62015TJ0480-N36: N 40
- 62015TJ0480-N38: N 55
- 62015TJ0480-N39: N 56
- 62015TJ0751-N33: N 46
- 62017CJ0373-N61: N 49 51
- 62017CJ0373-N60: N 51
- 62017CJ0373-N62: N 51
- 62017CJ0373-N87: N 52
- 62017CJ0373-N83: N 53
- 62018CJ0039: N 43
- 62018CJ0307-N123: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N124: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N125: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N126: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N127: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N128: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N129: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N130: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N131: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N132: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N133: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N134: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N135: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N136: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N137: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N138: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N139: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N140: N 73
- 62018CJ0307-N151: N 84
- 62018CJ0307-N152: N 84
- 62018CJ0307-N150: N 85
- 62018TJ0515-N66: N 43
- 62018TJ0515-N67: N 43
- 62018TJ0531-N68: N 44
- 62019TJ0399-N47: N 48
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Rejet de plainte, Europe 2022, n° 10 octobre, comm. 336 (FR)
- 2. Idot, Laurence: Mise en oeuvre des articles 101 et 102 TFUE par la Commission : l'encadrement de procédures particulières, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2022, n° 4, p. 774-781 (FR)
- 3. Monti, Barbara: Rejet de plainte : Le Tribunal de l’Union européenne rejette le recours en annulation fondé sur une violation de l’article 105 TFUE contre la décision de rejet d’une plainte de la Commission européenne (Design Light & Led Made in Europe e.a.), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2022, nº 4, p. 129-130 (FR)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
