EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0578
Case T-578/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Sophia Group v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of assistance services for buildings — Rejection of a tenderer’s offer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Award criteria — Most economically advantageous tender — Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-578/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Sophia Group v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of assistance services for buildings — Rejection of a tenderer’s offer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Award criteria — Most economically advantageous tender — Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-578/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Sophia Group v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of assistance services for buildings — Rejection of a tenderer’s offer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Award criteria — Most economically advantageous tender — Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria — Obligation to state reasons)
OJ C 128, 12.4.2021, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.4.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 128/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Sophia Group v Parliament
(Case T-578/19) (1)
(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of assistance services for buildings - Rejection of a tenderer’s offer - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Award criteria - Most economically advantageous tender - Use of labels and certifications in the formulation of award criteria - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 128/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Sophia Group (Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Belgium) (represented by: Y. Schneider and C.-H. de la Vallée Poussin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Tapper Brandberg and B. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 30 July 2019 to award Lot No 1 of the tender for the ‘Provision of Buildings HelpDesk services’ (Call for tenders 06A 0010/2019/M011) to another tenderer.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Sophia Group to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings. |